.
Feedback

Lawrence Maintains Tax Rate in 2012-13 Budget

Mayor Martin Oliner's proposal to lower the rate was denied once again.

Village of  trustees once again denied Mayor Martin Oliner’s plea to lower taxes on Monday and voted of $71.60 per $100 of assessed property.

“The notion that we have so much of our tax payer's money is inappropriate,” Oliner told the board. “It may be small, but the notion is that it is time to start giving back.”

Trustees argued there wasn’t enough in the village's roughly $7.5 million fund balance or the recreational budget to allow Oliner’s proposed 2.3 percent tax cut, and unanimously agreed to keep the same rate. Most residents will see their taxes go down because property assessments have gone down.

“I think it’s a very dangerous precedent and a very slippery slope,” Deputy Mayor Joel Mael said. “If I was running this as my own business, I would actually increase the tax rate, but I would be comfortable keeping it flat for another year.”

Mael said the proposed cut would only save $25 per household, arguing the risk was too great for such a small break for residents.

At the end of Monday’s meeting, the board agreed on a $6,479,513 fiscal plan for 2012-13, a $306,052 increase to the current operating budget.

The board also reduced their projected revenues by $100,000, funding originally set aside for the ’s rebuilding project which is currently under deliberation, reducing the total appropriated revenue to $1,559,687.

“We do not have that agreement in place, and I do not know if it will ever be in place,” Trustee Ed Klar explained. “I don’t think it’s appropriate to budget $100,000 for something that doesn’t exist yet.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Five Towns Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bojames May 17, 2013 at 08:15 pm
All above by the original writer notwithstanding it is morally reprehensible that people who did ,Read More do not, would not send their children to public school but rather private school, religious or secular, sit on a public school board of education. They are there for one reason only ;to keep taxes as low as possible because those that elect them carry private school tuition. That is NOT an acceptable reason to direct/control/guide the education of public school students. Any position put forward that disputes this as the basis for parents of private school students being on a BOE is a lie.
Tova Markowitz May 17, 2013 at 05:18 pm
I'm amazed and shocked to hear about the shenanigans. Thank you for revealing what has been goingRead More on. I will forward your article to my friends and make sure we vote for Nachum. Thank you and your family for your dedication and efforts. Stay strong. We need you ,,
Chris Albanese May 17, 2013 at 04:05 pm
It's not just the teachers... As a parent of 2 going on 3 school aged children, I'm amazed at howRead More much our free public schools cost. We get a supply list every year of things like crayons and pencils which I get, although I don't see why it HAS to be crayola. The red crayon in the box from the 99 cents store is just as red as the one in the $4 box from someplace else. Also, I don't understand why I need to send in 4 boxes of tissues, paper towels, wipes, etc per child. When I was a kid, I remember keeping a little pack of kleenex in my desk for when I needed it. I'm sure the district can buy in bulk at half the cost to us and store it in the schools until needed. Also, as far as the teachers go, I'm not sure if they do it on LI, but when I was a SBM in the NYC DOE, we had what was called Teacher's Choice which was a check for $250 that every teacher would get on March 15 (?) to help pay for the classroom supplies they bought throughout the year. It always amazed me how many of the "supplies" were purchased on 03/14. I had the pleasure of denying some of the more bogus expenses. Also, anything they would spend above and beyond their reimbursement is now tax deductible I believe. My wife, sister, cousin and many friends were and some still are classroom teachers. I know firsthand how the good ones give much more than they get in their check(s). The trick is to weed out the ones that are only in it for the money, benefits and summers off and not the kids.
lilly May 14, 2013 at 02:18 pm
I do not understand how we never have a year with NO TAX INCREASES!!!!! It is pretty sad- we have toRead More get new resources, get more project bids and simply learn to say no or tighten up and not spend and what about salary freezes! We are all living with these types of challenges. We are living through difficult times. When I look around the town and see so many homes and stores for rent and sale- it should be a lightbulb moment. We can't continue to live this way. People will keep leaving the neighborhood and that's really not good for any of us!
Luncheon at Mother Kelly's
paul May 11, 2013 at 11:25 pm
Way to go Harvey! Happy Birthday and keep up the good work... Others depend on you....
Donna Galinsky April 25, 2013 at 09:07 pm
It is possible to find a rental, though it might not be easy. Many rentals are in co-op buildings.Read More They are typically not flexible and it is unlikely that you will be able to get into one of those. Your best bet would be in a multi-family house, There you are dealing with a homeowner, rather than a co-op board and a management company, who might be willing to listen to your plight. If you find a sympathetic homeowner you will be OK. It might take patience, but you should find someplace.