.
Feedback

How Sandy Has Affected the Nassau Real Estate Market

Prospective buyers have been scared to look on the south shore, while other markets saw delays.

Karen Szteinberg had been in contract to sell her South Merrick home and in the process of buying a co-op in Freeport — and then Hurricane Sandy hit. 

Her home had been unscathed by the superstorm, but the co-op was badly damaged. The South Merrick home eventually sold, but now Szteinberg lives in a short-term rental awaiting an update. Still, she says, the massive storm has not affected her outlook on the Long Island real estate scene.

“There can be a natural disaster or intentional act anywhere you live,” she said. “In all honesty, I have considered moving more inland, but I prefer to live in proximity of my business and friends on the south shore. Wherever I move, it would be a gamble.”

Other Nassau County residents, as well as realtors, have echoed Szteinberg’s sentiment — people want to live where they want to live, despite the havoc caused by — what they hope — is a once-in-a-lifetime storm. However, at least in the short term, many potential buyers have been scared off by properties in neighborhoods on the south shore, whether by future weather events or high insurance coverage costs.

“The impact has been uneven. Along the shore it’s created a lot of concerns and doubts among both buyers and potential sellers,” said Lawrence Levy, executive dean of Hofstra’s National Center for Suburban Studies. “There’s a lot out there about storms being more frequent and worries about getting insurance and it being enough to rebuild and rebuild it the same way.”

Up and down

The number of home sales on the south shore did in fact decline in the last quarter of 2012. In the last months of 2011, 166 home sales were reported, according to a report by real estate firm Douglas Elliman and appraisal firm Miller Samuel. The number of home sales decreased to 127 in the final quarter of 2012, a 23.5 percent decline. On the north shore, homes sales went from 415 in the fourth quarter of 2011 to 530 in 2012, an increase of 27.7 percent.

It’s possible that the drop on the south shore reflects homes that have been taken off the market while their owners complete storm repairs, according to realtors.

Meanwhile, homes are still getting more expensive in Nassau County. In 2011, the average sale price of a south shore home was $402,709 and a north shore home was $858,592, according to the report. Both numbers jumped in 2012, to $453,172 and $969,769, respectively.

The water problem?

Realtors and potential sellers confirmed people’s apprehension toward some properties on the south shore.

“[Sandy] will no doubt change people’s perception of property by the water,” said Patty Murphy, a realtor at Village Plaza Realty in Malverne, who added that properties by the water had been hard to sell for at least two years, likely due to insurance costs.

Jackie Katz-Rabinoff, who had listed her Harbor Green Estates home in Massapequa for sale before Sandy hit, said that although her home had no water damage, “not one person has come to see my house since the storm.”

She added, “South of Merrick Road seems to no longer hold the appeal it used to.”

Some prospective buyers and investors are still looking at homes along the water on the south shore, but at reduced prices, said Seth Levy, of Shawn Elliott Luxury Homes.

Levy pointed to one home in Hewlett Harbor, with a 1.73 acre lot and a tennis court. The large property would have entered the market at $3.5 million had it not been damaged in the storm, Levy estimates, but it is now listed for $1 million less. The home is now in contract.

Another neighborhood in the Five Towns, North Woodmere, saw many homes with flood damage. Still, people have been grabbing the homes there for its lower taxes, according to Donna Galinsky of Pugatch Realty in Woodmere.

“I wish it were black and white, but it isn’t,” she said about Sandy’s impact on Nassau real estate. “We’re still trying to figure it out.”

Staying put?

For many Long Islanders, this storm has not changed their preference toward living near the water.

“People have a lot of pride, and when I hear them talk about what has happened, they plan on rebuilding and staying,” Lindenhurst realtor Jackie Connelly-Fornuff of Century 21 wrote in a Patch blog post. “Living on the water in Lindenhurst is a lifestyle, and these homeowners do not want to give that up.”

Another devastated area, Long Beach, has seen a surge of investors interested in buying homes at heavily-discounted rates.

In Garden City, Sandy only delayed the beginning of the 2013 real estate market due to power outages and needed repairs, according to Stephanie Cullum of Coach Realtors.

The tax threat

Weather events, in the end, may not be the biggest threat to Long Island real estate.

Levy, of Hofstra, said that people are still attracted to Long Island for its high wages, “gorgeous” beaches, park system, governmental services, proximity to New York City and “the best, in aggregate, public school system in the country.”

But Levy warned that something needs to be done to change the “trajectory of property taxes.”

Szteinberg agreed, saying, “I’m an optimist; I’ll worry about the next storm in another 40 to 50 years from now. But way before then, I will probably have already moved off of Long Island due to our high taxes.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Five Towns Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bojames May 17, 2013 at 08:15 pm
All above by the original writer notwithstanding it is morally reprehensible that people who did ,Read More do not, would not send their children to public school but rather private school, religious or secular, sit on a public school board of education. They are there for one reason only ;to keep taxes as low as possible because those that elect them carry private school tuition. That is NOT an acceptable reason to direct/control/guide the education of public school students. Any position put forward that disputes this as the basis for parents of private school students being on a BOE is a lie.
Tova Markowitz May 17, 2013 at 05:18 pm
I'm amazed and shocked to hear about the shenanigans. Thank you for revealing what has been goingRead More on. I will forward your article to my friends and make sure we vote for Nachum. Thank you and your family for your dedication and efforts. Stay strong. We need you ,,
Chris Albanese May 17, 2013 at 04:05 pm
It's not just the teachers... As a parent of 2 going on 3 school aged children, I'm amazed at howRead More much our free public schools cost. We get a supply list every year of things like crayons and pencils which I get, although I don't see why it HAS to be crayola. The red crayon in the box from the 99 cents store is just as red as the one in the $4 box from someplace else. Also, I don't understand why I need to send in 4 boxes of tissues, paper towels, wipes, etc per child. When I was a kid, I remember keeping a little pack of kleenex in my desk for when I needed it. I'm sure the district can buy in bulk at half the cost to us and store it in the schools until needed. Also, as far as the teachers go, I'm not sure if they do it on LI, but when I was a SBM in the NYC DOE, we had what was called Teacher's Choice which was a check for $250 that every teacher would get on March 15 (?) to help pay for the classroom supplies they bought throughout the year. It always amazed me how many of the "supplies" were purchased on 03/14. I had the pleasure of denying some of the more bogus expenses. Also, anything they would spend above and beyond their reimbursement is now tax deductible I believe. My wife, sister, cousin and many friends were and some still are classroom teachers. I know firsthand how the good ones give much more than they get in their check(s). The trick is to weed out the ones that are only in it for the money, benefits and summers off and not the kids.
lilly May 14, 2013 at 02:18 pm
I do not understand how we never have a year with NO TAX INCREASES!!!!! It is pretty sad- we have toRead More get new resources, get more project bids and simply learn to say no or tighten up and not spend and what about salary freezes! We are all living with these types of challenges. We are living through difficult times. When I look around the town and see so many homes and stores for rent and sale- it should be a lightbulb moment. We can't continue to live this way. People will keep leaving the neighborhood and that's really not good for any of us!
Luncheon at Mother Kelly's
paul May 11, 2013 at 11:25 pm
Way to go Harvey! Happy Birthday and keep up the good work... Others depend on you....
Donna Galinsky April 25, 2013 at 09:07 pm
It is possible to find a rental, though it might not be easy. Many rentals are in co-op buildings.Read More They are typically not flexible and it is unlikely that you will be able to get into one of those. Your best bet would be in a multi-family house, There you are dealing with a homeowner, rather than a co-op board and a management company, who might be willing to listen to your plight. If you find a sympathetic homeowner you will be OK. It might take patience, but you should find someplace.