.

Lawrence Schools Details Changes at Pre-K

School district turns to the University Pre-K Program to meet its budget goal.

The Lawrence School District is planning on eliminating 18 pre-kindergarten positions at the  — nine teachers and nine aids — and implementing the University Pre-K Program, a partnership which would replace these positions with 18 recent graduate students from a Long Island university. 

Superintendent Gary Schall explained that since Lawrence is currently under a 2 percent tax cap and forced to cut $3.2 million from the budget due to mandated increases, the University Pre-K Program would be the best choice for the district. The current universal pre-k program costs the district roughly $1.7 million, he said, while the new University Pre-K Program would operate under a $570,000 lump sum grant.

“We’re saving over $500,000 on this plan,” Schall explained. “We are hoping that we have our positions reduced by attrition.”

The program is part of the district's budget plan that would also eliminate four positions at Lawrence High School and the number of periods there from nine to eight. The plan will be voted on by the board of education at the April 30 budget meeting.

Dr. Ann Pedersen, principal of Number Four School, attempted to reassure the crowd of concerned teachers and parents that the students' education will not suffer.

“We don’t want to change what we have,” Pedersen said. “We will not have a university impose on the curriculum.”  

Even with this reassurance, , president of the Lawrence Teachers' Association, left the meeting with reservations about the new program.

“You can't compare a brand new teacher with someone who's been teaching for 20 or 30 years, like some of these pre-k teachers,” she said. “If they weren't in the hole for $3 million, would they be looking?”

Jesse Lunin-Pack, while committed to sending his son to pre-kindergarten in the Lawrence Public School system in the fall, also questions whether this is the right program for his child.

“Is this the best way to educate our children, or is this the least bad choice to save money?” Lunin-Pack asked. “If this program is going to happen, the best thing would be to find a way to include experienced teachers in the classroom.”

Chris Albanese March 21, 2012 at 04:23 PM
I think Mr. Lunin-Pack hit the nail on the head. This is basically the least bad choice. The other choices would being cutting the program in half, making it a pay for service program -which really doesn't help the community that desperately needs the program or eliminating Pre-K completely. In any scenario, teaching positions would be lost. At least this way, some parents will still have an opportunity to send their children to a Pre-K program. Pre-K (and Kindergarten for that matter) are not mandated grades, so the school districts are not obligated to offer these programs and the state can choose to defund them at any time. We've been spoiled to think that our child care & education must be paid by the government from the cradle to a high school diploma and beyond.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something