.
Feedback

Letter to the Editor: District 15 Needs to Negotiate With LTA

Teachers' union head says no deal would be bad for the students.

This letter was submitted to the editor by Lori Skonberg, head of the Lawrence Teacher's Association.

Though I’m not really sure where to begin, I should start by thanking the Board of Education for approving of a retirement incentive that will lead to the retirement of 17 teachers. While we will miss these dear colleagues, we understand that the incentive was a win-win for the district, which will save millions of dollars, and the LTA, which will not face teacher layoffs. We can only hope that the spirit of cooperation that enabled us to negotiate the terms of this incentive will also materialize during the ongoing contract negotiations between the LTA and the district.

To date, it would be an understatement to say that we have been disappointed with the progress of these negotiations. In order to reach a settlement, we must have a partner committed to the negotiations process. However, the Board’s actions have shown more apathy than commitment. Since our contract expired last June, we have met only three times. Since the school year began in September, we have met only once.

We have repeatedly submitted lists of possible meeting dates in an effort to negotiate.  More times than not, the Board did not even dignify us with a response. It would be one thing if their refusal to negotiate only affected the LTA. However, their refusal to negotiate, if it continues, will have drastic negative consequences on the children of this district as well.

New York State currently requires every school district to have a newly approved Annual Professional Performance Review, or APPR, in place by January 2013. Otherwise, districts will lose significant amounts of state aid for every month that a new APPR is not in place. According to Superintendent Gary Schall’s budget presentation, this amount currently stands at $6.9 million. If the Board’s refusal to negotiate continues, and the district loses state aid as a result, would they raise taxes to make up for the budget shortfall? Or would they make Draconian cuts to the public schools instead?  Both of these options are not only unacceptable, they are avoidable.

The solution is clear. Negotiate. We have nine months to reach a new contract, and a new APPR, before the state deadline takes effect. For committed partners, there is still plenty of time left. We were able to negotiate an agreement on the retirement incentive because it was mutually beneficial. We hope that the Board understands that negotiating a new teacher’s contract is mutually beneficial as well, especially with the unsettling prospect of being punished by New York State if the contract is not settled by January.

As the elected stewards of the Lawrence Public Schools, the Board owes it to the community, and to the children, to make sure that this cut in state aid never occurs. Therefore, members of the Lawrence Board of Education, please join us at the negotiating table, in good faith, and let us hammer out an agreement together.  We know it can be done. To say it would be a shame for the district to lose millions of dollars in state aid would be the greatest understatement of all, and it simply cannot be allowed to happen. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Five Towns Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bojames May 17, 2013 at 08:15 pm
All above by the original writer notwithstanding it is morally reprehensible that people who did ,Read More do not, would not send their children to public school but rather private school, religious or secular, sit on a public school board of education. They are there for one reason only ;to keep taxes as low as possible because those that elect them carry private school tuition. That is NOT an acceptable reason to direct/control/guide the education of public school students. Any position put forward that disputes this as the basis for parents of private school students being on a BOE is a lie.
Tova Markowitz May 17, 2013 at 05:18 pm
I'm amazed and shocked to hear about the shenanigans. Thank you for revealing what has been goingRead More on. I will forward your article to my friends and make sure we vote for Nachum. Thank you and your family for your dedication and efforts. Stay strong. We need you ,,
Gail May 21, 2013 at 05:33 pm
Chris - Educators also receive a $200-$250 tax credit on their personal income tax returns.
Chris Albanese May 17, 2013 at 04:05 pm
It's not just the teachers... As a parent of 2 going on 3 school aged children, I'm amazed at howRead More much our free public schools cost. We get a supply list every year of things like crayons and pencils which I get, although I don't see why it HAS to be crayola. The red crayon in the box from the 99 cents store is just as red as the one in the $4 box from someplace else. Also, I don't understand why I need to send in 4 boxes of tissues, paper towels, wipes, etc per child. When I was a kid, I remember keeping a little pack of kleenex in my desk for when I needed it. I'm sure the district can buy in bulk at half the cost to us and store it in the schools until needed. Also, as far as the teachers go, I'm not sure if they do it on LI, but when I was a SBM in the NYC DOE, we had what was called Teacher's Choice which was a check for $250 that every teacher would get on March 15 (?) to help pay for the classroom supplies they bought throughout the year. It always amazed me how many of the "supplies" were purchased on 03/14. I had the pleasure of denying some of the more bogus expenses. Also, anything they would spend above and beyond their reimbursement is now tax deductible I believe. My wife, sister, cousin and many friends were and some still are classroom teachers. I know firsthand how the good ones give much more than they get in their check(s). The trick is to weed out the ones that are only in it for the money, benefits and summers off and not the kids.
Shirley Hanein Lane May 19, 2013 at 05:50 pm
lilly, i just created a group on Facebook (Hewlett-Woodmere District 14 Budget Discussion) forRead More residents of district 14 to share and question. Maybe someone on the board will look at it. Please tell your friends. A copy of the budget is uploaded and can be reviewed. I believe residents should make informed decisions. Read it and see what jumps out at you and looks good, fishy, or just normal.
lilly May 19, 2013 at 03:36 pm
thanks Shirley- we have to keep posting to vote NO for the budget- I try to go to meetings and it isRead More ridiculous to hear how no one comes to the table with ideas of how NOT to SPEND our money! If there were only more people that would attend and stand up and speak up maybe it would change.
Shirley Hanein Lane May 19, 2013 at 02:39 pm
Lilly, you are so correct that there are so many houses for sale and stores for rent. Who wants toRead More move to a district that looks like a ghost town? And let's not forget about the homes that were affected by Hurricane Sandy? People are still rebuilding. Download the budget from the district website and go over it item by item. You will see that the increases are mainly in textbooks and retirement, bus matrons, and BOCES, not "for the Kids" as the lawn signs say. District 14 is so used to getting what they ask for because no one bothers to read the budget. Many residents have drunk the Kool-Aid and would never question the decisions of the administrators or the School Board. And NOT ONE of the candidates mentions FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY! They seem to think that residents are an endless fount of money, when is that going to change?!?!?
Luncheon at Mother Kelly's
paul May 11, 2013 at 11:25 pm
Way to go Harvey! Happy Birthday and keep up the good work... Others depend on you....
Donna Galinsky April 25, 2013 at 09:07 pm
It is possible to find a rental, though it might not be easy. Many rentals are in co-op buildings.Read More They are typically not flexible and it is unlikely that you will be able to get into one of those. Your best bet would be in a multi-family house, There you are dealing with a homeowner, rather than a co-op board and a management company, who might be willing to listen to your plight. If you find a sympathetic homeowner you will be OK. It might take patience, but you should find someplace.